ADT Home Security Settlement
Processed by Dahl Administration
The following is a list of frequently asked questions about this settlement. To view the answer to a question, please click on the question from the list below. The answers to these questions will be updated periodically to reflect the current status of the settlement.
Plaintiffs brought the Actions on behalf of ADT customers who contracted with ADT or with an authorized ADT dealer for installation of a residential security system that operated using at least one wireless peripheral sensor. Plaintiffs allege that ADT failed to disclose to its customers the alleged vulnerability of the wireless sensors to evasion and jamming using electronic devices. ADT denies the allegations, denies liability, and asserts numerous defenses.
In a class action, one or more people called Class Representatives (in this case, Dale Baker, Janet Cheatham, Michael Edenborough, Santiago Hernandez, and Patricia Wilson) sue on behalf of people who have similar claims. The Class Representatives seek to have a single court resolve the issues for all members of the class, except for those who wish to exclude themselves from the class.
The Court did not decide in favor of either Plaintiffs or ADT. The proposed Settlement is a compromise of disputed claims. Rather than continuing to argue in court, both sides agreed to participate in mediation before a highly experienced and respected mediator, and through those efforts the Parties were able to agree to the Settlement.
Before entering into the mediation with ADT, the lawyers for the Plaintiffs in all the Actions (“Class Counsel”) conducted an extensive investigation of the facts, including formal discovery in the Edenborough Action and the Related Actions, reviewing some 45,000 pages of documents produced by ADT, conducting witness interviews and taking deposition testimony of many key witnesses. Class Counsel also retained expert witnesses to evaluate the various elements of their claims. With the assistance of these experts, Class Counsel analyzed the significant risks associated with the continued litigation of this Action, including risks relating to: (a) prevailing on class certification; (b) overcoming ADT’s defenses; (c) calculating class-wide damages (a complex determination further complicated by the lack of readily available alternative protected residential wireless systems); and (d) overcoming significant evidentiary obstacles in connection with anticipated motions for summary judgment by ADT. Based on all these considerations, Class Counsel and the Class Representatives think the Settlement is best for all Settlement Class Members.
The Settlement Class is comprised of “the current or former ADT customers who between November 13, 2009 and August 15, 2016 entered into a contract with ADT or an ADT dealer for installation of a residential security system, or who had ADT or an ADT dealer install a residential security system, that includes at least one wireless peripheral sensor.”
The Settlement Class does not include those current and former ADT residential customers whose accounts were assumed, purchased or otherwise acquired by ADT from any third-party other than ADT dealers, including but not limited to any other alarm company.
Yes. Even if you fall within the Settlement Class as described in FAQ 4, you are not a Settlement Class Member if you are: (1) a current and former employee, officer and director of ADT and its agents, subsidiaries, parents, successors, predecessors, or any entity in which they or their parents have a controlling interest; (2) the judge to whom this case is assigned and the judge’s immediate family; (3) any person who executes and files a timely request for exclusion from the Class; (4) any person who has had their claims in this matter finally adjudicated and/or otherwise released; and (5) the legal representative, successor or assign of any such excluded person.
If you are still not sure whether you are included, you can ask for free help. You can call the settlement administrator at 1-888-439-1531 or visit the SETTLEMENT DOCUMENTS section of this website for more information.
ADT has agreed to pay $16,000,000.00 (“the Settlement Amount”) for the benefit of Settlement Class Members.
YOU MUST SUBMIT A CLAIM FORM TO PARTICIPATE IN THE SETTLEMENT. The Claim Form is included in the Detailed Notice. An electronic version of the Claim Form that you can fill out and submit online is here. Only one Claim Form can be submitted per contract with ADT.
The Settlement authorizes Class Counsel to seek an award of attorneys’ fees of up to a maximum amount of one-quarter (25%) of the Settlement Amount and to request reimbursement of the out-of-pocket litigation expenses they have already paid in connection with the Actions.
In addition, Class Counsel will ask the Court to approve payment to the Settlement Administrator of class notice and settlement administration costs. Furthermore, subject to the Court’s approval, Dale Baker, Janet Cheatham, Michael Edenborough, Santiago Hernandez, and Patricia Wilson will request service awards in varying amounts of no more than $10,000 for their efforts in undertaking the litigation, assisting Class Counsel with the prosecution of the Actions, subjecting themselves to discovery and depositions, and serving as Class Representatives.
If approved by the Court, these attorneys’ fees, expenses, costs and service awards will be paid from the Settlement Amount. After payment of the fees, expenses, costs and service payments awarded by the Court, the remainder of the fund (“the Net Settlement Amount”) will be divided among Settlement Class Members who submit a timely and valid Claim Form.
The Net Settlement Amount will be distributed pursuant to a Plan of Allocation to be approved by the Court. Discovery conducted in the Actions shows that the Settlement Class Members who contracted with ADT or an ADT dealer after July 23, 2014 for installation of a security system with a wireless peripheral sensor have stronger claims than those who contracted before that date because certain information about the alleged vulnerability of the wireless sensors to evasion and jamming was brought to the attention of ADT by an employee at the Oak Ridge National Laboratories on or about that date. Under the proposed Plan of Allocation, therefore, Settlement Class Members who contracted with ADT or an ADT dealer after July 23, 2014 will receive a higher payment than those who contracted with ADT or an ADT dealer before that date, as follows:
PLEASE NOTE: The above-specified payment amounts may be adjusted up or down depending on the number of Claim Forms received, so as to fully and fairly allocate and pay out the entire Net Settlement Amount to Settlement Class Members who submit Claim Forms. None of the money in the Settlement Amount will revert back to ADT.
PLEASE NOTE: The determination of whether you executed a residential security contract with ADT or an ADT dealer for installation of a residential security system, or whether you had ADT or an ADT dealer install a residential security system, during the period November 13, 2009 through July 23, 2014, or during the period July 24, 2014 through August 15, 2016, is based on the date that you entered into your first residential security contract with ADT or an ADT dealer for installation of a residential security system with a wireless peripheral sensor, or the date that you first had ADT or an ADT dealer install a residential security system with a wireless peripheral sensor, regardless of whether you subsequently renewed that contract, entered into any subsequent contracts, or had any residential security system or security system components subsequently installed.
To qualify for a payment, you do not need to do anything other than submit a Claim Form; either by mail or online by February 26, 2018, confirming your status as a Settlement Class Member (see responses to FAQ 4 and FAQ 5). If the Court approves the Settlement, you will be sent money by check from the Settlement Administrator to the address specified in your Claim Form. Only one check will be issued per ADT account.
If you are a member of the Settlement Class and do not submit a Request for Exclusion, but you fail to submit a timely and valid Claim Form, you will not receive any money from the Settlement, but you will still be bound by all of the terms of the Settlement Agreement, including the Judgment and the release of Plaintiffs’ Released Claims.
The Court will hold a hearing on February 1, 2018, to decide whether to approve the Settlement. If the Court approves the Settlement, there may be one or more appeals. It’s always uncertain whether these appeals can be resolved, and resolving them may take time, often more than a year. Once any and all appeals are resolved, the Settlement Administrator can distribute the Net Settlement Amount.
Unless you exclude yourself, you will stay in the Settlement Class, and all of the Court’s orders will apply to you and legally bind you. That means that you cannot sue, continue to sue, or be part of any other lawsuit against ADT about the legal issues in any of the Actions. If you stay in the Settlement Class, you will release and forever discharge any and all direct, individual, or class claims, rights or causes of action or liabilities whatsoever, whether known or unknown, whether accrued or unaccrued, and whether arising under federal, state, local, statutory, common or any other law, rule, or regulation that were or could have been asserted against ADT and its present and former affiliates, agents, officers, directors, employees, parents, subsidiaries, predecessors, successors and assigns, by Plaintiffs or any other Settlement Class Members in any of the Actions, predicated upon the facts alleged in the Actions. Your released claims do not, however, include any claims for personal injuries or for damage to or loss of property. For example, if you suffered a burglary that resulted in damage to your house or belongings, or you sustained personal injuries from the break-in, you can participate in this Settlement and still pursue any claims against ADT for your claimed injuries and property damage as if this Settlement did not exist.
Any benefits you receive may or may not be the subject of state or federal taxation depending on your individual circumstances. Class Counsel are not tax attorneys and you are advised to seek separate legal advice on matters of taxation.
To exclude yourself from the Settlement, you must send the Settlement Administrator a letter by mail saying that you want to be excluded from the Settlement. Your request for exclusion must include all of the following:
You must mail your request for exclusion postmarked no later than January 2, 2018 to:
ADT Home Security Settlement
c/o Dahl Administration
PO Box 3614
Minneapolis, MN 55403-0614
If you ask to be excluded, you will not get any Settlement payment, you cannot object to the Settlement and you cannot ask to speak at the Final Approval Hearing. You will not be legally bound by anything that happens in the Actions. Depending upon the applicable statute of limitations, you may be able to sue (or continue to sue) ADT on you own regarding the issues raised in the Actions.
No. Unless you exclude yourself, you give up any right to sue ADT for the claims that this Settlement resolves. Your released claims do not, however, include any claims for personal injuries or for damage to or loss of property. If you have a pending lawsuit against ADT (or any of its related parties as described in answer to FAQ 11), speak to your lawyer in that case immediately. You may have to exclude yourself from the Settlement Class to continue your own lawsuit against ADT or any of its related parties. Remember, the exclusion deadline is January 2, 2018.
No. If you exclude yourself, you will not receive any money from the Settlement. But, you are free to sue, continue to sue, or be part of a different lawsuit against ADT.
The Court has appointed Thomas A. Zimmerman, Jr. of Zimmerman Law Offices, P.C. as Lead Class Counsel for the Settlement Class (“Lead Counsel”), and the following attorneys to serve as legal counsel for the Settlement Class (“Class Counsel”): Francis J. Balint, Jr. of Bonnett, Fairbourn, Friedman & Balint, P.C., Mark A. Chavez of Chavez & Gertler LLP, Adam D. Warden of Saxena White P.A., and William C. Wright of The Law Offices of William C. Wright, P.A.
You will not be charged for these lawyers. If you want to be represented by your own lawyer, you may hire one at your own expense.
Class’ Counsel will ask the Court to approve payment of attorneys’ fees in an amount not to exceed one-quarter (25%) of the Settlement Amount, plus reimbursement of their litigation expenses. In addition, Dale Baker, Janet Cheatham, Michael Edenborough, Santiago Hernandez and Patricia Wilson will ask the court to approve service awards in varying amounts of no more than $10,000 for their services as Class Representatives. The attorneys’ fees would pay Class Counsel for investigating the facts, litigating the case and negotiating the Settlement. The Court may award less than the amounts requested. The amounts paid for attorneys’ fees, litigation expenses and service awards will be paid out of the Settlement Amount and will reduce the $16,000,000.00 available for Settlement Class Members. In addition, the costs for providing notice to the Settlement Class Members and the costs to administer the Settlement will also reduce the fund available for Settlement Class Members.
If you are a Settlement Class Member, you can object to the Settlement if you don’t like any part of it and tell the Court why you feel the Settlement should not be approved. The Court will consider your views. To object, you must mail or your lawyer must file a document with the Court stating that you object to the Settlement with ADT. Your objection must include:
In addition to you mailing or your attorney filing your objection with the Court, the objection must also be mailed to each of the following addresses, postmarked no later than January 2, 2018:
|Court||Lead Class Counsel||Defense Counsel|
Clerk of the Court
U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of California
450 Golden Gate Ave.
San Francisco, CA 94102
Thomas A. Zimmerman, Jr.
Zimmerman Law Offices, P.C.
77 W. Washington St., Suite 1220
Chicago, IL 60602
Mark L. Levine
Bartlit Beck Herman
Palenchar & Scott LLP
54 W. Hubbard St., Suite 300
Chicago, IL 60654
Objecting is simply telling the Court that you do not like something about the Settlement. You can object only if you stay in the Settlement Class. Excluding yourself is telling the Court that you do not want to be part of the Settlement Class. If you exclude yourself, you have no basis to object because the case no longer affects you.
The Court will hold the Final Approval Hearing at 2:00 pm on February 1, 2018, at the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, 450 Golden Gate Ave., San Francisco, CA 94102. At this hearing, the Court will consider whether the Settlement with ADT is fair, reasonable, adequate and in the best interests of the Settlement Class. The Court will also consider whether to approve the proposed Plan of Allocation of the Settlement proceeds to the Settlement Class. The Court will also consider (a) the application by Class Counsel for payment of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses out of the Settlement Fund created through their efforts, and (b) the application for the payment of Service Awards to the Class Representatives.
If there are any timely objections to the Settlement, the Court will consider them. The Court will listen to people who have asked to speak at the hearing. After the hearing, the Court will decide whether to approve the Settlement and how much to pay Class Counsel and the Class Representatives. We do not know how long these decisions will take.
The Final Approval Hearing may be continued or adjourned by the Court without further notice to the Settlement Class. Settlement Class Members who may attend the Final Approval Hearing can check the IMPORTANT DATES section of this website.
No. Class Counsel will answer questions the Court may have. But you are welcome to attend at your own expense. If you send an objection, you don’t have to come to the hearing to talk about it. As long as you mailed your written objection on time, the Court will consider it. If you hired your own lawyer, you may have to pay your own lawyer to attend, but it’s not necessary that he or she do so.
You cannot speak at the hearing if you excluded yourself from the Settlement. If you filed a timely, written objection, you (or your own lawyer) may appear and speak at the Final Approval Hearing but, to do so, a notice of your intention to appear must be filed with the Court.
If you do nothing, then, if you are eligible and not excluded (as described in FAQ 4 and FAQ 5), you’ll automatically be part of the Settlement Class and (if you send in the Claim Form) be sent money from this Settlement based on the Plan of Allocation if the Settlement is approved by the Court. You will also be bound by the Judgment approving the Settlement and cannot start a lawsuit, continue with a lawsuit, or be part of any other lawsuit against ADT about the issues in the Actions, except that you will still be able to pursue your claims against ADT for any claimed injuries or property damage that you may have sustained.
This notice summarizes the proposed Settlement. More details are in the Settlement Agreement.
You can call the Settlement Administrator at 1-888-439-1531, write to the Settlement Administrator at ADT Settlement Administrator, c/o Dahl Administration, P.O. Box 3614, Minneapolis, MN 55403-0614 or visit the SETTLEMENT DOCUMENTS section of this website, where you will find other information to help you determine whether you are member of the Settlement Class and whether you are eligible for payment. You can also call Lead Class Counsel at (312) 440-0020, email Lead Class Counsel at firstname.lastname@example.org, write to Lead Class Counsel at 77 W. Washington St., Suite 1220, Chicago, IL 60602, or visit Lead Class Counsel’s website at www.attorneyzim.com.
If you wish to review all of the pleadings and other records in the Edenborough Action, including the Settlement Agreement, they may also be examined online on PACER at www.pacer.gov/findcase.html. After arriving at the website, click the ‘Search the PACER Case Locator’ link, then follow the directions and enter 16-cv-02233 as the case number and click ‘SEARCH.’ Images of every document filed in the case may be viewed at a minimal charge. You may also view images of every document filed in the case free of charge by using one of the computer terminal kiosks available at the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, 450 Golden Gate Ave., San Francisco, CA 94102.